Mystic_harbor_management_plan.pdf

Members

Dave Carreau jcarreay@aol.com Chair

Lou Allyn allynlouis6@gmail.com Vice Chair

Ken Scott k.scott@snet.net

Michael Lague lague.michaelm@gmail.com

Rod Cook kitrod@aol.com

Don Procko mysticharbormaster@gmail.com

Matthew Beaudoin matt@mysticknotwork.com

Fred Allard frederick.allard@snet.net

Mystic Harbor Management Commission mystichmc@gmail.com

Mystic Harbor Management Manual

It is clear that the MHMC was intended to do much more that manage mooring and river traffic. Water Quality, Structure appearance,Fishing, and Protection of costal resources were key issues. It was expected that the Commission would actively work with other commissions to achieve these goals. 

The Mystic Harbor Management Commission will coordinate efforts with the Stonington Shellfish Commission to ensure mutually supportive policies. ...Water quality is of particular importance to the shellfish issue...

Issues

1. Water Quality "The basic policy to improve water quality is to interact with other commissions that impact or are impacted by the use of the Mystic River.  Examples of such agencies include the water pollution control authorities, fire districts, planning and zoning commissions, enforcement agencies, shellfish commissions, etc. The Mystic Harbor Management Commission will coordinate efforts with the Stonington Shellfish Commission to ensure mutually supportive policies. ...Water quality is of particular importance to the shellfish issue..."

2. Structures There was clearly a concern for the potential for docks to interfere with aesthetics, and the ability of the public to use and enjoy the water resources

a. Use Impact: "Excessively long docks, for example, might unnecessarily block fairways outside marked channels, or infringe upon mooring areas or other reasonable uses of the water by the public."

b. Aesthetic impact: "The Mystic River and immediate environs are a significant scenic resource and are so recognized at the State and Federal levels. Many of the vistas are not only pleasing to the eye but are also notable on a cultural basis." 

"Therefore, site planning and design features which limit or avoid negative visual and aesthetic impacts or which create positive visual and aesthetic impacts on the site and on the surrounding area should be incorporated. The architecture size materials color and texture of new structures should be blended with the existing qualities and characteristics of the surrounding man-made and natural environments. "

"Visual access to the water should be maintained improved or enhanced."

c. Suitability of Engineering Design. "Technical features of the proposed structures should be clearly described and must be credible, including reasonable margins for storm and ice conditions. The burden of proof for new or unusual construction techniques or materials shall be with the applicant."

The scale of the proposed facility should be the minimum necessary to secure a legitimate water-related function. 

d. Pier Construction -- "Residential Property It is recognized by this Commission that the owners of residential waterfront have a right to wharf out where there is no conflict with the aforementioned standards. The location of docks should not interfere with neighboring landowner's riparian lines"

e. Fishing . "It is the policy of the Commission to preserve these fisheries by the adoption and implementation of the following policies:

Areas of the River where recreational fishing is historically intensive shall be preserved from encroachment by structures and boat moorings.

Conscious of critical habitat species such as eel grass and ascophyllum, the Commission will strive to preserve existing beds"

3. Activities  "The Mystic River estuary... offers many interesting sights and scenic vistas. This area provides subject matter for countless photographs, sketches and paintings.  Many people, residents as well as visitors, take pause and relax by the water's edge. ...many people seem to draw strength from the serenity of the Mystic River."